USAA’s d:school
To speed USAA’s digital transformation, the Chief Design Office began a mission to get 30,000 employees to think, act and collaborate like designers through human-centered design — of which Bring Your Own Epic (BYOE) is a cornerstone program.
*BYOE is not associated with the d:school at Stanford
WHAT DOES BYOE LOOK LIKE:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bring your work, your team and learn design thinking within the context of USAA.




Bring your work, your team and learn design thinking within the context of USAA.



Cross-disciplinary teams defining what is desirable for members, viable for business, feasible to build and compliant within regulations.
d:school was part of a broader set of HCD offerings

WHY DID USAA NEED A BYOE?
Design Thinking is an industry-standard way to develop products & services. Design S&P says 215% increase in revenue for design led companies. This way of working is common at digitally-native companies ... how do you change the way 30,000 people work at a legacy company?
CHALLENGES WE ENCOUNTERED:
WICKED PROBLEM TO SOLVE:
How might we ... change the culture of collaboration with 150+ product teams at USAA?
IMPACT:
OPERATIONAL SAVINGS:
![]()
BEHAVIORAL INDICATORS:
QUALITATIVE INDICATORS:
Design Thinking is an industry-standard way to develop products & services. Design S&P says 215% increase in revenue for design led companies. This way of working is common at digitally-native companies ... how do you change the way 30,000 people work at a legacy company?
CHALLENGES WE ENCOUNTERED:
- Company not getting ROI of design operating at the scrum layer
- Confusion on how Scaled Agile & HCD work together
- Poor cross-disciplinary teaming
- Product Management not accomplished by one job role
WICKED PROBLEM TO SOLVE:
How might we ... change the culture of collaboration with 150+ product teams at USAA?
IMPACT:
OPERATIONAL SAVINGS:
-
The program I led created an ~$4.4M in savings for USAA.

BEHAVIORAL INDICATORS:
- 500+ individuals completed the program
- 8 Epics were shipped to market
- 9.1s Net Promoter Score
QUALITATIVE INDICATORS:
- 5,000+ employees annual goals focused on cross-functional teaming
- Program operates today without my involvement (as of ‘22)
MY PROCESS:
Discovery ︎ Ideation ︎ Evaluative Research ︎ Prototype ︎ Implementation
🔭 Discovery
Having conducted qualitative research (Bermuda Triangle of Product Teams) our team had a solid foundation of human insights.
Key findings we surfaced:
- stop educating 1-role
- design teams make the difference in HCD adoption
- the customer is no where in SAFe 🙅🏼♂️
- design needed to improve its strategic partner role
Methods:
• generative research
• desk research
• how might we ...









Understanding current customer and business conditions

Design considerations in SAFe | ✏️: Erin Hauber
QUESTIONS LEAVING DISCOVERY:
- How might we ... deepen design’s relationship with their cross-functional team?
- How might we ... get cross-functional teams to practice HCD to solve problems?
- How might we ... demonstrate the connective link between Agile and HCD?
🧠 Ideation
Our team wrote ‘how might we’ questions in discovery and generated 100 ideas before deciding on a direction to explore.
Methods used:
• idea vignettes and prioitization
• provocation cards
• concept refinement


Framework to bridge insights with ideas (🧠: Scott Gerlach)


Individual and group idea generation




Feedback to gut-check us before evaluative research
Q: What is the value of a team offsite?
A: Offsites are a great opportunity for a team to get out of the daily grind of cranking out work, to look up and out at the work ahead. They should happen at least once a year!
Q: Why create Concept Generation & Refinement framework?
A: An exploratory and analytical framework can help us pursue lots of ideas that are more likely to work for our problem space.
🧪 Evaluative Research
After we received another round of feedback we increased the fidelity of our ideas to test them with target users for the program.
Methods used:
• evaluative research
• concept refinement
🤽🏻♀️ Prototype
We had a clearer winner in the testing of our concepts — team’s biggest pain points were upstream, where alignment occured between partners at the portfolio layer.
Methods used:
• storyboarding
• pilot prototype
• surveys, retrospective

End-to-end was the clear winner


Storyboard

🚀️ Implementation
After our initial pilot, we received mountains of feedback, and I began working on a strategy to inform how we would execute moving forward.
I tightened our value prop, BYOE provided:
- clearer, more understandable human value
- less design and dev rework
- products more likely to be competitive in the market
Methods used:
• ecosystem map
• experience strategy
• service blueprinting
Defining the Strategy
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Experience Strategy
Communicating the value to 5,000+ employees
Executing the Strategy
![]()
Learning HCD by doing HCD design ...
![]()
... on your own work ...
![]()
... and with your cross-functional team
Testing with end-users and legal partners
Improving the Program
![]()
Readiness checks and orientation calls helped teams increase success
Pre-Read | Application
![]()
HCD Stories from the Field
![]()
Elevating design teams to be the experts
Deepening design facilitation
Creating covertable materials
![]()
The higher design swims within strategy the greater the return.





Experience Strategy

Communicating the value to 5,000+ employees
Executing the Strategy

Learning HCD by doing HCD design ...

... on your own work ...

... and with your cross-functional team


Testing with end-users and legal partners
Improving the Program



Pre-Read | Application

HCD Stories from the Field

Elevating design teams to be the experts


Creating covertable materials

The higher design swims within strategy the greater the return.
MY ROLE:
I was lead designer and product owner of Bring Your Own Epic. I participated in generative research, led concept exploration/testing, built the program curriculum and strategy, developed our marketing funnel, launched our initial pilot, scaled the program across the company and translated to a remote offering during COVID.
KEY LEARNINGS:
- Changing the people of behavior is a wicked problem. People are complicated, have different incentives and don’t always have an appetite to change the way they have always done it.
- Our greatest asset early on was a “tell us why this won’t work” mindset. This allowed our team to surfaced risky assumptions often and while getting buy-in from stakeholders.
- HCD Case Studies, presented by business partners, were a key scaling mechanism. These ‘stories from the field’ told the value of design thinking in a way that our team of experts couldn’t.
Thumbnail illustration by Madison Staires.